People v. F.I.

Home |  Case Results |  People v. F.I.
Possession of a Firearm

The client was charged with multiple counts. The DA’s office in Brooklyn kept changing the plea offers on us. We provided zealous advocacy for our client and refused to take any offer. What the DA’s office did not know was that when they were going back and forth with us about one unacceptable plea offer after another, the speedy trial clock was still running. In fact, they were over their allotted amount of time when the ADA called me to ask me if our client was going to accept the new offer. I said we were not going to accept any offer, and since you are beyond the speedy trial time, we will be filing a motion to dismiss because of your negligence. They reviewed their file and sent me the following response: “The appearance of section 110 in front of the charge indicates it is an attempt to commit the crime.”

Had we been foolish and allowed the plea to go forward, the client would have a conviction on their record. Instead, they have a full dismissal of all the charges below. They are also a former member of our military, and I am very happy to be able to restore their criminal history with no convictions

Case Name:
People v. F.I.

Practice Areas

Contact Us Now

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Case Results

Testimonials

es_MXES