DWI Breath Test
DWI Breath Test
As a fundamental requirement for the admission of breathalyzer test results in a prosecution under Vehicle and Traffic Law section 1192, the prosecutor must introduce evidence from which the trier of fact could reasonably conclude that the breath testing device was in proper working order at the time the test was administered to the defendant.
Proof that the test operator was certified by the Health Department to conduct breathalyzer tests, while permitting the inference that the test was properly given, is not probative of the distinct foundational requirement concerning the accuracy of the machine.
Before the percentage of alcohol can be considered, the prosecutor must show that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while he was intoxicated, or that the arresting officer gave the defendant a breath test to determine if the defendant had consumed any alcohol. Evidence must also be presented to show that the breathalyzer test was performed within two hours of arrest, since a test conducted more than two hours after arrest is stale.
Evidence must be introduced both that the breathalyzer was in proper working condition when the test was given to the defendant, and that the chemicals used in the test were of the proper kind and in the proper proportion.
Attorney for the DWI Breath Test in Manhattan
Breath test results constitute a powerful but not conclusive evidence of guilt in a DWI case. If you were arrested for DWI in Manhattan or in New York City then contact an experienced criminal defense attorney at Greco Neyland, PC.
Find out how we investigate the breath test to determine whether there are any grounds to ask the court to suppress or exclude the results at trial.
Legal Limit in New York Drunk Driving Cases
New York uses sevearl different BAC levels for pre se offenses of drunk driving which are as follow:
- 0.08% for an adult;
- 0.04% in a commercial motor vehicle; or
- 0.02% for a driver under 21 years of age (under New York’s Zero Tolerance Law).
Attacking the Breath Test in a DWI Case
During a trial, the criminal defense attorney will impeach the test accuracy and reliability by various methods, including the introduction of extrinsic evidence demonstrating possible sources of machine malfunction and by cross-examination of the law enforcement officer who administered the breath test in order to show operator error.
Proof of a breathalyzer reading of .08 or more within two hours after arrest establishes prima facie, a violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(2), which, together with evidence of one or more of defendant’s deportment, speech, stability and the odor of his or her breath, is sufficient to sustain a conviction, absent evidence, expert or other and by whichever party produced, from which the trier of fact could conclude that defendant’s blood alcohol content (“BAC”) at the time of vehicle operation was less than .08.
Finding a Breath Test DWI Lawyer in Manhattan
If you were arrested for DWI after submitting to a breath test on a breathalyzer machine, then contact an experienced criminal defense attorney at Greco Neyland, PC. Our attorneys are experienced in representing clients in DWI cases and DWAI cases. Whether this is your first drunk driving offense or a second or subsequent drunk driving offense, call us to discuss your case.
We help clients with a BAC between .05 and .07, .08 and .17, and over .18. Let us put our experience to work for you. Call (212) 951-1300 to discuss your case today.
FREE CONSULTATION
Submit this form to have your case reviewed by our attorney.
Our Practice Areas
Our Offices
Midtown (Main Office)
Greco Neyland, PC
535 5th Ave #2500
New York NY 10017
(212) 951-1300
White Plains
75 S Broadway 4th floor
White Plains, NY 10601
(914) 898-8800
Meet Our Attorneys
Jeffery Greco
Experience as a former prosecutor gives Jeffery Greco and edge in building the strongest possible defense strategy for the accused in Ney York City
Dustan Neyland
A through investigation is key to finding every reasonable doubt and geting charges reduced or dismissed for NYC defense attorney Dustan Neyland.
testimonials
RATED 5/5 BASED ON 52 CUSTOMER REVIEWS
















































share your side
of the story
Give us the details of your case and we will provide a free case evaluation.
share your side
of the story
Give us the details of your case and we will provide a free case evaluation.
CASE RESULTS
FEDERAL FELONY
Client faced a mandatory minimum of 10 years incarceration, we were able to secure a sentence of 1 day in jail.
BURGLARY
Client rejected all plea offers. After the trial concluded, the jury needed only 2 hours to acquit client of all felony charges, and even the criminal mischief charge as well.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
We were able to convince the Manhattan DA's office to dismiss the case without any ACD at all. The case was dismissed and sealed immediately.
BANK FRAUD
After preparing this case for a JURY TRIAL, the DA's office finally offered a reduced charge and gave my client a no-jail sentence of probation.
CASE RESULTS
FEDERAL FELONY
Client faced a mandatory minimum of 10 years' incarceration, we were able to secure a sentence of 1 day in jail.
BURGLARY
Client rejected all plea offers. After the trial concluded, the jury needed only 2 hours to ACQUIT client of all felony charges, and even the criminal mischief charge as well.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
We were able to convince the Manhattan DA's office to dismiss the case without any ACD at all. The case was dismissed and sealed immediately.
BANK FRAUD
After preparing this case for a JURY TRIAL, the DA's office finally offered a reduced charge and gave my client a no-jail sentence of probation.
RECENT BLOG POST
The Definitive Guide for Those Charged with Federal Crimes in NYC
When the United States Department of Justice charges you with a crime in New York City, you’ve got a long road ahead. The full weight of the federal government’s law enforcement and prosecutorial machine is arrayed against you. Protecting your freedom and guiding your case to its best possible outcome is going to depend…
Is It a Crime to Insult a Police Officer?
It is not a crime to insult a police officer. It is, in fact, your First Amendment Right to do so. There have even been Supreme Court decisions about this. In 1987, the City of Houston vs. Hill case protected this type of speech, in response to an ordinance that prohibited citizens from “interrupting police…
GRECO NEYLAND, PC 535 5TH AVE #2500, NEW YORK, NY 1017
(212) 951-1300
(CLICK FOR DIRECTIONS)